Crestal sinus lifts when RBH is 2–6 mm: what recent data mean for your chair
Two recent clinical reports show that modified osseodensification burs can safely extend transcrestal sinus elevation down to about 2 mm RBH with high short‑term implant survival, and that choosing a super‑hydrophilic implant surface does not produce a clear radiographic advantage at 12 months.

Transcrestal (crestal) sinus floor elevation remains attractive for single implants in the posterior maxilla because it avoids a lateral window, shortens treatment time and needs less equipment. A new retrospective cohort of 81 patients reports outcomes after using a modified osseodensification bur (the “Sun Bur”) for transcrestal sinus elevation in sites with 2.0–6.0 mm residual bone height (RBH). Overall implant survival and success were high (79/81 implants, 97.5%) after a mean follow‑up of about 23 months, and the sinus membrane perforation rate was low (5/81, 6.2%). Bone height gain averaged around 4.6 mm in the 2–<4 mm RBH group and about 3.1 mm in the 4–6 mm group (difference driven largely by starting height). The authors conclude the modified OD bur produced predictable lifts and high short‑term survival across both RBH bands. ([visualize.jove.com](
Clinical takeaways
- If you use osseodensification (OD) for crestal sinus lifts, tSFE is a reasonable option down to ~2 mm RBH in selected single‑implant cases — but expect slightly larger absolute vertical gain in very low RBH because you start lower.
- Plan for a membrane perforation rate in the single‑figure percent range (4–7% in recent series); use careful CBCT planning, copious irrigation, low travel depth and visual/magnification checks when you approach the sinus floor.
- Hydrophilic implant surfaces showed a numerical but non‑significant trend to greater bone volume after grafted crestal lifts; don’t expect a reliable radiographic advantage at 12 months — focus first on technique, graft containment and stability.
Sources
- Modified Osseodensification Bur (Sun Bur) for Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation With 2-6 mm Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (2026). DOI: 10.1111/jerd.70265
- Bone regeneration after transcrestal sinus lift using nanoscale super-hydrophilic versus standard implant surfaces: a single-center, 12-month, parallel controlled clinical trial. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2026). DOI: 10.1007/s10006-026-01627-4
- Maxillary sinus membrane perforation rate utilizing osseodensification‑mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (2024). DOI: 10.1111/cid.13368
- Evaluation of crestal sinus floor elevations using Versah (Densah) burs with simultaneous implant placement, RBH ≥2.0 and <6.0 mm (prospective studies and reviews). Clinical literature (selected reviews and prospective cohorts) (2020–2025). DOI: 10.1177/0022034516683932